Decision Instrument

Expose where decision owners and operators diverge.

Scores six alignment domains for both leader perception and team reality to map where stated agreement breaks down in practice.

Confirm access

You are acquiring a decision instrument. Immediate use expected.

Decision Alignment Gap Map

Maps the gap between stated agreement and operational reality

Used when alignment is assumed but not tested

£29 · One-time access

Paid instrument

£2910 minutes to alignment classification

Interactive instrument

→Decision alignment score

→Gap map by domain

→Misalignment zone identification

→Divergence signal

✓ Writes to Decision Centre memoryNo dossier

Decision alignment classified.

When to use this

·Leaders believe alignment exists but execution suggests otherwise

·Team says they agree but actions diverge

·Priority conflicts surface only during execution

·Communication is frequent but not effective

What this produces

·Decision alignment score

·Gap map by domain

·Misalignment zone identification

·Divergence signal

·Correction priority

What changes after use

You stop assuming agreement.

You identify where perception and reality diverge.

What happens if you don't use this

·Decisions proceed on assumed agreement

·Misalignment surfaces under execution pressure

·Corrections cost more when discovered late

This is one part of the decision. Exposure, authority, and intervention logic must all resolve for the decision to hold.

Controlled instrument access

Confirm access above. The first-use environment opens immediately after payment confirmation.

Tokenized access · no public PDF route

Where this fits

Feeds Mandate Clarity Framework.

Complements Team Assessment for authority-level decisions.