Decision Instrument

Clarity of authority determines the quality of decisions.

Uses a 4-quadrant authority map and 17 forcing questions across four scored blocks to produce a Mandate Clarity Score (0–100) with classification-specific corrective paths.

Confirm access

You are acquiring a decision instrument. Immediate use expected.

Mandate Clarity Framework

Defines who decides and where authority is breaking

Used when decision ownership is unclear or contested

£49 · One-time access
When to use this
·Decisions are delayed without clear reason
·Multiple stakeholders appear to own the same decision
·Escalation paths are unclear
·Authority is assumed, not verified
What this produces
·4-quadrant authority map (formal / actual / sponsor / contested)
·Mandate Clarity Score (0–100) from four scored sub-blocks
·Mandate classification (clear / fragmented / delayed / absent)
·Friction diagnosis: overlapping, absent, shadow, bottleneck
·Classification-specific corrective path with review cadence
What changes after use

You stop guessing who owns the decision.

You remove hidden authority conflicts before they escalate.

What happens if you don't use this

·Authority gaps persist — decisions stall or get made by the wrong person

·Restructuring proceeds on assumed alignment that does not exist at execution level

·Escalation paths remain undocumented — crisis response becomes improvised

This is one part of the decision. Exposure, authority, and intervention logic must all resolve for the decision to hold.

Controlled instrument access

Confirm access above. The first-use environment opens immediately after payment confirmation.

Tokenized access · no public PDF route
Where this fits

This instrument clarifies structure before escalation.

If authority is misaligned, Executive Reporting formalises the consequence.

If escalation is required, move to Strategy Room.