Are decisions being reviewed at the declared frequency?

Are reviews following the governance standard, or becoming perfunctory?

Are issues being escalated when they should be, or absorbed silently?

Is it clear who is accountable for each decision outcome?

Is decision evidence getting stronger or weaker over time?

Are commitments being tracked and executed, or forgotten?

Decision cadence is slipping. Reviews are happening but inconsistently.

Governance drift is active. Decision cadence (5/10) requires correction before the drift becomes structural. Quarterly oversight review recommended.

Schedule a governance review within 14 days. Drift is accumulating.